Give Europe a Face Logo HOME

Latest News




Search


SpacerHomeContactForumSpacerSpacer

Presentation "Give Europe a Face"



GEaF.ppt


eCards



Stamp


Newsletter



  Your name:
  

  Email:
  

  HTML emails?
  

  
Are you subscribed already and wishes to unsubscribe or edit your profile, click here.

Magazine




Discover the special edition on the European elections of "The New Federalist", the European Magazine of the Young European Federalists.

download the magazine here! 1,424KB PDF file


Special Interviews



What do the European Youth political parties think?

Interviews By Arielle Rouby

What faces do the Young European parties want to give to Europe?



Shortened versions can be found in the Summer 2004 edition of The New Federalist...

 

 


You are here:  Give Europe A Face > Newsletter > Newsletter 22.12.2004 

CONTENTS:

1. Editorial
2. Euro-Quotes
3. Speaking to…Prof David Phinnemore
4. The new Commission
5. Commissioner's Hearings
6. Echoes of Political Parties
7. Youth on the Move
8. GEAF Events


 

1. Editorial

Dear Europeans!

The year 2004 is slowly, but surely, moving towards its end. It certainly has been a very exciting year for European Politics. It was the year of European Parliament's elections, it was the year of the first European Constitution, it was the year when a new Commission was elected and it was the year when the EUropean Union opened its door to Turkey. All together, this events gave a new face to Europe.

In this issue we will focus on what has perhaps been the most exciting event of all - the election of the new European Commission in the European Parliament (EP). For many of us demanding a different procedure of electing the Commission President and individual Commissioners, the developments can be judged as positive. The institutional "confrontation" has been widely regarded as positive by the European citizens and the National media have found some interest in the matter - resulting in more Europeans being aware of what happens in European institutions and political life.

In addition, the EP has placed itself on a more ambitious route than those before. After the low participation in the European Elections in June, we have witnessed a strong stand of the EP vis-à-vis the Commission and the Council. Will this bring us to a Europe where citizens have more influence on how decisions are made? Will this result in a higher participation at the next EP elections? Will this result in more and better awareness about European Politics. All these questions are addressed by Prof David Phinnemore in the interview included in this edition of the Newsletter.

These developments might guarantee a very European year in 2005. They bring a healthy measure of optimism that the EU is moving closer to a Union of its citizens and not mere Member States and their governments. With this in mind we wish you joyful New Year's celebrations and a successful 2005!

Enjoy the last days of 2004!

Best regards,

Editor in Chief


NOTE: This Information Newsletter will continue to be published in 2005 on a two-weeks basis and will provide information on different topics of European interest. The next issue will be in your inboxes on the 10th of January 2005.

Your contributions are welcome at newsletter@giveeuropeaface.net , deadline for the next issue is 7th January 2005. You can read all articles of this Bulletin in full length on: http://www.giveeuropeaface.net

Contact details follow at the end of this newsletter.

-----

[to top of page...]


 

2. Election-Quotes

In this edition we focus on quotes about the "non-election" of the European Commission on the 27th October 2004.

-----

"This statement brings the EU into political virgin territory."

”Sooner or later it was going to happen; sooner or later the parliament was going to use the powers the Treaties have conferred on it. You can not give power to an institution subject to the condition that it will never use it.”

Josep Borrell (PES), the President of the European Parliament

-----

“MEPs have found the escalator that will lead them, if necessary to a position where they can use their constitutional ‘nuclear option'-the power to sack the whole EC.”

Andrew Duff (ALDE), MEP

-----

“The European Parliament moved from the puberty to maturity in one fell swoop. For MEPs was like watching history unfold.”

Catherine Stihler (PES), MEP

 

[to top of page...]


 

3. Speaking to...Prof David Phinnemore

In this issue we speak with Prof David Phinnemore from the Queen's University in Belfast. Prof Phinnemore is senior lecturer on a variety of European issues, but one of his main areas of interest is the Constitutional development of the EU.

-----

1. In June elections for the European Parliament (EP) we have seen a picture of a tired Europe ¯ a low turnout, an increasing influence of anti-European parties and a general apathy towards European affairs. After the hearings in the European Parliament with the candidates for the new Commission we have seen a diametrically different situation ¯ an EP that is willing to take matters in its hands.

Do you see any connection among these two events and do you think that European citizens will have the chance to see a radically different EP in the next 5 years?

I wonder whether we should really interpret the outcome of the EP elections so negatively. Within the EU(15), turnout was on average slightly higher than in 1999 and although eurosceptic parties did make gains, they are still a small minority within the EP. As for whether the EP will be more assertive over the next few years, much will obviously depend on its President and the leadership of the major groupings. The EP certainly seized a valuable opportunity during the hearings for the incoming Commission to prove that it is an institution with powers that it exercises independently and in a responsible manner. This brought it respect and may help change popular views of it.

2. More on the hearings. The European Constitution will give more powers when electing a new Commission to the EP, but during the recent events Barrosso seemed to be left aside in the corner by the member states and there is a danger this might stay in the future. Do you think that now the future candidates for President will have less problems with reshuffling their teams in case of need?

The experience of 2004 will certainly make the member states think more about who they propose as Commissioners in the future. And withholding approval can no longer be regarded as a 'nuclear option' for the European Parliament. Threatening to withhold approval worked this year and this will encourage MEPs to contemplate issuing similar threats again. This should give the Commission President ¯ who will also be elected by the European Parliament ¯ more leverage over the member states.

3. The »Buttiglione case« has been very present in the national media as well. According to some surveys, a significant number of people has heard about the issue and this created some room for a European debate. How do you evaluate the perception of the EP after the hearings? Will this increase the interest of European citizens to follow more the work of the EP and more importantly to vote in the EP elections in 2009?

I certainly get the impression that the European Parliament is now more highly regarded. It gained media attention and generally I think citizens saw it behaving in a responsible manner in exercising one of its key responsibilities. Whether the positive perception will persisit is open to question. Much will obviously depend on how much the various national media report proceedings and debates. The evidence suggests that since the Buttiglione affair, the coverage has returned to previous levels. This does not bode well. On the other hand, ratification of the European Constitution is attracting attention. If anything is going to stimulate greater popular engagement with EU matters and lead potentially to a higher turnout in the 2009 elections, it is this.

4. Many claim that the whole story about electing the new Commission has benefited European Union, since it gave its Institutions more visibility. Do you think that the EU needs more institutional conflicts like this ¯ similar to the national one ¯ and do you think that such conflicts bring the EU to political normality?

Institutional conflicts do attract media, and by implication popular, attention. Such attention is to be welcomed. Yet they cast the EU in a very unflattering and distorted light and therefore can actually undermine the image and perpetuate stereotypical views of the EU. The challenge is to develop popular awareness and understanding of the EU based on what it actually does rather than on sporadic and often over-sensationalised 'crises' and 'power struggles'.

For more information about Prof David Phinnemore visit the website:

http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofPoliticsInternationalStudies/
AboutUs/StaffProfiles/Phinnemore/

-----

[to top of page...]


 

4. The new Commission

The new Commission took office on the 22nd November. Its President José Manuel Durão Barroso is leading a team of 24 Commissioners.

Commission president:

- Jose Manuel Barroso, Portugal

 

Vice-presidents:

- Siim Kallas, Estonia: administrative affairs, audit and anti-fraud

- Jacques Barrot, France: transport

- Guenter Verheugen, Germany: enterprise and industry

- Franco Frattini, Italy: justice freedom and security

- Margot Wallstroem, Sweden: institutional ties and communication strategy

 

Other members:

- Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Austria: external relations

- Louis Michel, Belgium: development and humanitarian aid

- Markos Kyprianou, Cyprus: health and consumer protection

- Vladimir Spidla, Czech Republic: jobs and social affairs

- Mariann Fischer Boel, Denmark: agriculture and rural development

- Olli Rehn, Finland: EU enlargement

- Stavros Dimas, Greece: environment

- Laszlo Kovacs, Hungary: tax and customs union

- Charlie McCreevy, Ireland, internal market and services

- Andris Piebalgs, Latvia: energy

- Dalia Grybauskaite, Lithuania: financial programming and budget

- Viviane Reding, Luxembourg: information society and media

- Joe Borg, Malta: fisheries and maritime affairs

- Neelie Kroes, the Netherlands: competition

- Danuta Huebner, Poland: regional policy

- Jan Figel, Slovakia: education, training, culture and multilingualism

- Janez Potočnik, Slovenia, science and research

- Joaquin Almunia, Spain: economic and monetary affairs

- Peter Mandelson, United Kingdom: trade

 

The list and profiles of the new members of the European Commission that will sit on office until 2009, can be found at:

http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/commission_barroso/index_en.htm

-----

4.1. Barroso's statement on the 27.10.2004

"I have asked to take the floor at this point because I think it is important that I share with you my analysis of the present situation. I have listened very attentively to yesterday's debate. I have had extensive contacts with the group leaders and I have also spoken with the President of the European Council. I have come to the conclusion that if a vote is taken today, the outcome will not be positive for European Institutions or for the European project.

In these circumstances, I have decided not to submit a New Commission for your approval today.

I need more time to look at this issue and to consult with the European Council further so that we can have strong support for the new Commission. It is better to take time to get it right. These last days have demonstrated that the European Union is a strong political construction and that this Parliament, elected by popular vote across all our Member States, has a vital role to play in the governance of Europe. I was honoured to have received your support as president designate in July. I committed myself then to work actively with you in the European interest; I renew that commitment today. I think we can agree, Mr President, on our common commitment to reinforce the democratic nature of European integration, and I would hope that we can arrive at an outcome in the next few weeks which will permit us to take forward work in the European Union in this spirit. I can always offer you a loyal cooperation for the good of Europe."

-----

4.3. Barroso's statement on the 17.11.2004

Plenary session of the European Parliament

 

Mr President, Honourable Members

Three weeks ago I suggested to “stop the clock”. Today, I believe it is the moment to start it again and submit my team to your approval.

The decision to postpone the vote was widely welcomed both inside and outside this Parliament as a means to create the conditions for a positive outcome to this process of approval; a process which shows European democracy in action.

Tomorrow you can choose to give strong parliamentary support to the incoming Commission and by doing so you can deliver a further victory for European democracy.

You can confirm a Commission that wants - as I clearly indicated in July when I had the honour to receive your support as President-designate - to have a close relationship with this Parliament (a “positive complicity” as I like to call it); a Commission that with your support and partnership can drive forward a European agenda that can make Europe matter to its citizens....

You can read the full Barroso's statement on-line at:

http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/
04/484&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

-----

4.4. Full result of the vote on approval of the Commission

The new Commission was (after a three-weeks delay) elected on the 18. November 2004. The result was 449 votes in favour to 149 votes against with 82 abstentions.

 

For the full information about the voting on the Barroso Commission II, please visit the EP "Daily Notebook" at:

http://www2.europarl.eu.int/

-----

[to top of page...]


5. Commissioner's hearings

All the hearings of the candidates for the European Commission were streamed on-line and are still available at:

http://www.europarl.eu.int/press/audicom2004/index_en.htm

The general Hearings website:

http://www.europarl.eu.int/hearings/commission/2004_comm/default_en.htm

-----

[to top of page...]


6. Echoes of Political Parties

In this section we try to collect the political reactions of the European Parties and Youth Political Parties to the recent events in the EP related to the non-election of the first Barroso Commission.

-----

6.1. ELDR

Press Release: Barroso makes right decision in last moment

Brussels/Berlin, 27 October 2004

ELDR Party President Dr Werner Hoyer, MP responds to the withdrawal of the proposed line up of designate Commissioners by Commission President designate Barroso:

“Commission President designate Barroso has taken the right decision today to withdraw his line up of designate Commissioners.

Full PR on-line: http://www.eldr.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=528

-----

Press Release: EU Commission and European Parliament reinforced !!!

22/11/2004

Berlin: Werner Hoyer, MdB, Vice-President and Speaker of the FDP Group in the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Bundestag, made the following comments on the approval of the new European Commission by the European Parliament:

Barroso has made good use of the two weeks he had asked for in order to set up a new team to head the Commission. His new proposal took into account the legitimate concerns of the European Parliament and therefore received the support of a large majority of the European Parliament.

Full PR on-line:http://www.eldr.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=533

-----

6.2. EPP Group in the EP

Press Release: Full confidence in Rocco Buttiglione

12/10/2004

T he EPP-ED Group has full confidence in the personal and political abilities of the Italian Commissioner-designate Rocco Buttiglione, EPP-ED Group Chairman Hans-Gert Poettering has declared.

F ollowing the latest reports on votes in the European Parliament's Justice and Home Affairs Committee, Poettering made clear that Buttiglione had the full confidence of the EPP-ED Group.

Full PR on-line:

http://www.epp-ed.org/Press/showpr.asp?PRControlDocTypeID=1&
PRControlID=2942&PRContentID=5634&PRContentLG=en

-----

Press Release: EPP-ED Group supports new European Commission.

21/10/2004

The Chairman of the EPP-ED Group in the European Parliament, Hans-Gert Poettering, has said that the outcome of the meeting with the future Commission president Jose Manuel Durao Barroso as positive. Mr. Barroso, he said, had affirmed once again that close relations between the Commission and Parliament would be a priority in his work. Mr. Poettering's belief that for the EU to be effective, it required both a strong Commission and a strong Parliament was also shared by Mr. Barroso in the meeting of Chairs of political groups in the EP. Mr. Poettering furthermore welcomed the Commission President's announcement that the would assume a role of 'policy-guidance' in the new Commission, thus enhancing the accountability of the Commission.

Full PR on-line:

http://www.epp-ed.org/Press/showpr.asp?PRControlDocTypeID=1&
PRControlID=2977&PRContentID=5684&PRContentLG=en

-----

Press Release: Hans-Gert Poettering calls on Parliament to give its confidence to the new European Commission

26/10/2004

Speaking in a debate in the European Parliament on the new European Commission, the Chairman of the EPP-ED Group said:

"On the 22 July the European Parliament decided to vote with confidence for the future President of the European Commission, Mr Barroso. We expressed our trust and our confidence on that occasion. Today you are here with your team, the team of future Commissioners who have been proposed by the governments of the Member States. As the future President of the Commission you have stated that you are prepared to co-operate very closely with the European Parliament.

Full PR on-line:

http://www.epp-ed.org/Press/showpr.asp?
PRControlDocTypeID=1&PRControlID=2988&PRContentID=5705&PRContentLG=en

-----

6.3. PES Group in the EP

PR: Socialists warn 'Barroso' in stand-off.

14th October 2004

Socialist Euro MPs today, 14th october 2004, threw down a warning to Commission President-designate José Manuel Barroso after he dismissed serious criticisms of his team by parliamentary inquiry committees. To loud applause in the European Parliament, Socialist Group leader Martin Schulz declared: "If Mr Barroso wants to have the confidence of the Socialist Group, he has to come up with a different way of treating this house."

Read on-line:

http://www.socialistgroup.org/gpes/servlet/
Main/Communique~2?_wcs=true&lg=en&from=list&id_press_release=2502

-----

Party of European Socialists (PES)

PR: EUROPEAN SOCIALISTS DECLARE 'VICTORY' OVER BARROSO CLIMB-DOWN

27 October 2004

President of the European Socialist Party Poul Nyrup Rasmussen declared "victory" today after a showdown with the disgraced incoming European Commission forced its president designate Jose Manuel Barroso into a climb-down over his controversial Italian nominee commissioner Rocco Buttiglione.

Full PR on-line: http://www.pes.org/scripts/NewsEvents/pressarchive_detail.asp?lang=EN&ID=266

-----

6.4. Greens/EFA Group

PR: Commission withdrawal is a victory for Parliament

Strasbourg, 27 October 2004,

The Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament welcomed José Manuel Barroso's withdrawal today of his proposed college of European Commissioners as a victory for parliamentary democracy.

Co-Presidents of the Greens/EFA Group, Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Monica Frassoni , said:

"The Parliament, and the voters who elected us, won an important victory today. We stood up to pressure from Member States and rejected the unsuitable candidates that they wanted to dump into extremely important jobs in the Commission."

Read the full PR on-line: http://www.greens-efa.org/en/press/detail.php?id=2110&lg=en

-----

PR: Greens/EFA will reject deeply flawed Commission

Strasbourg, 26 October 2004

Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Monica Frassoni , Co-Presidents of the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament, today announced that their Group had no confidence in Commission President-designate José Manuel Barroso's proposed team and would thus vote to reject the new EU executive tomorrow in Strasbourg.

They said:

"We believe, and others believe, that this is a deeply flawed Commission. Yet José Manuel Barroso has failed to address our concerns about some of his potential colleagues. He has ignored repeated calls for a reshuffle and instead proposed that he will take personal responsibility for any problematic issues that arise.

Read the full PR on-line: http://www.greens-efa.org/en/press/detail.php?id=2103&lg=en

-----

PR: Barroso must present new proposal for the Commission

Istanbul, 20 October 2004

The Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament today called upon incoming Commission President José Barroso to present a new proposal for his line-up of Commissioners to the Parliament.

A resolution tabled for next week's Strasbourg plenary session stresses that the Greens/EFA Group wants a strong Commission with political legitimacy and that is ready and able to bring forward the European project and promote sustainable development. The Commission as currently presented does not guarantee either of these principles, according to the Group.

Read the full PR on-line: http://www.greens-efa.org/en/press/detail.php?id=2092&lg=en

-----

6.5. European Liberal Youth (LYMEC)

PR: MEPs have a duty to vote against Mr. Barroso's Commission

October 25, 2004

LYMEC, European Liberal Youth, is deeply concerned at the recent turn of events at the heart of the European Union. To all liberal democrats and liberal-minded people alike, Rocco Buttiglione's remarks on homosexual rights, immigration and the role of women in modern society are clearly unacceptable and demonstrate that he is not competent for the position. Mr. Barroso's response on Friday was thoroughly unsatisfactory and shows a total lack of respect to the European Parliament .

On-line: http://www.lymec.org/modules.php?op=modload&
name=News&file=article&sid=278&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

-----

6.6. Young European Socialists (ECOSY)

PR: Demanding a Different European Commission

Brussels ¯ 20 October 2004

In the coming days you will vote on a new European Commission for five year term. We, progressive youngsters from all over the European Union, demand a European Commission different from the one Mr. Barroso propose.

We believe in a European Union with a more powerful European Parliament, as it is the only European body elected by its citizens. We also believe in a European Union that respects diversity and at the same time fundamental human rights. In this context we are deeply concerned about the nomination of Mr. Rocco Buttiglione as the new Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security.

Read full PR on-line: http://www.ecosy.org/index.php?transID=00000000000000001545

-----

[to top of page...]


7. Young on the Move!

 

7.1 JEF-News

-----

PRESS

Postponing the EP vote: right result, wrong method

Wednesday, 27.10.2004

Reacting to the news that the European Parliament vote to confirm the new European Commission has been postponed, the Young European Federalists (JEF-Europe) welcome the fact that the views of the European Parliament have been taken into account.

"It is very welcome that Barroso has finally deemed it necessary to listen to the European Parliament," stated Jon Worth, President of JEF-Europe....

Full PR on-line: http://www.jef-europe.net/presscentre/archives/002121.html

-----

Commissioners crisis: EP power to select the only solution

Thursday, 21.10.2004

Faced with the possible rejection of the whole European Commission by the European Parliament, the Young European Federalists (JEF-Europe) recognise the recent difficulties in the nomination process of the new Commission as being the result of a system that can no longer be sustained.

"Concerns about the competence and views of the Commissioners at the hearings have proven to be the straw that broke the camel's back for the European Parliament," stated Jon Worth, President of JEF-Europe....

Full PR on-line: http://www.jef-europe.net/presscentre/archives/002120.html

-----

Row over Commission hearings shows institutional defects

Friday, 08.10.2004

The Young European Federalists (JEF-Europe) are concerned by the hearings for the incoming European Commissioners and understand the frustrations of the European Parliament that feels it does not have the powers to get the Commission team that EU citizens deserve and that reflects the party political balance in the Parliament.

"The European Parliament is rightly frustrated," commented Jon Worth, President of JEF-Europe...

Full PR on-line: http://www.jef-europe.net/presscentre/archives/002118.html

To see Press Releases on other topics, please visit the JEF Press Centre: http://www.jef-europe.net/presscentre/

-----

[to top of page...]


8. GEAF Events

"GIVE EUROPE YOUR SAY! - FACE THE CONSTITUTION DEBATE "

21.-23. January 2005

Join the main event of the season!!!!

The “Give Europe a Face” campaign celebrates its 6 months anniversary. To commemorate it more than hundred of young people who have participated in the project will take part in an international gathering in Brussels from 21st to 23rd January 2005.

The objective of the event aims on one hand motivate youngsters to continue participating in the project, and on the other communicate to a wider audience which face Europe's young citizens want it to have.

You will have the opportunity to take part in a mock referendum campaign, seeing the mid-term results of the campaign and viewing the Exhibition of GEaF postcards…besides of course meeting new and former members of JEF…and party like only the JEFfers know.

If you want to know more about "Give Europe your Say! Face the Constitution Debate" Event click here

-----

[to top of page...]

 


CONTACT DETAILS

The bulletin is produced by:Young European Federalists/ Jeunes Européens Fédéralistes (JEF)
Editor in chief: Marko Bucik, Bureau Member JEF-Europe
Chaussée de Wavre 214d
1050 Brussels
info@giveeuropeaface.net